Sep 13, 2008

I didn't "love" the interview. It was ok. She seemed coached, nervous and out of her element. Charlie Gibson asked some very good questions. Questions I would like to see Obama answer. Gibson was condescending and it was obvious he doesn't like her AT ALL.

My advice to the McCain camp is to quit coaching her so much. What we like about her is that she is a real person.

I thought about responding to this article, but there is nothing worthy of debate. Another example of the fringe left doing what they claim the right does.

BTW, the authors wife is the tranny.

Reply

Sep 13, 2008

Jimmy Carter (a really high IQ, fully nuanced, liberal...mind you) was a NUCULAR scientist...served on a NUCULAR submarine, and he still says NUCULAR. Palin is a warrior and a leader. Get used to seeing her and get used to hearing that twangy voice. Feel free to continue to share your sexual fantasies about her.

Reply

Sep 13, 2008

LOL

Reply

Sep 13, 2008

See: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/11/politics/politicalplayers/main4442492.shtml

And: http://www.upi.com/news/issueoftheday/2008/09/12/ABCs_Gibson_grilled_Palin_hard_but_it_may_backfire/UPI-81241221234472/

for more commentary on this.

Reply

Sep 13, 2008

great links Jason. The UPI story accurately describes the way I looked at the interview. We'll see on the impacts either way--my guess is that Palin supporters will rally around her and well we know how the left feels about her. Regardless, McCain's choice was one of the most politically cunning moves ever. It is hard to remember a time when the opponents have been caught so flat footed and have taken so long to figure out how to effectively counter. The clock is still ticking.

Reply

Sep 13, 2008

Brilliant political move. Dems were stupid to dismiss this one.

Reply

Sep 14, 2008

She will be your Vice President, I know it's tough to get used to but we'll have a woman VP. As for the interview, she was decent but similar to Barack she works a crowd the best

Reply

Sep 14, 2008

The way I see it, there are only 3 things here worth commenting on, all of which point out the authors glaring hypocrisy, and lack of ability to understand.

1) "What you are NOT is responsible, informed, curious, thoughtful, mature, educated, empathetic, or remotely serious. I mean it."

This coming from someone who is clearly as far as you can be from responsible, informed, mature, educated, empathetic, or remotely serious, as evidenced by his lack of anything substantive in his entire post.

2) "Stop voting for people you want to have a beer with. Stop voting for folksy. Stop voting for people who remind you of your neighbor. Stop voting for the ideologically intransigent, the staggeringly ignorant, and the blazingly incompetent."

Is it just me, or did the author just describe Obama to a T?!

3) "Vote for someone smarter than you. Vote for someone who inspires you."

The author clearly has missed the fact that Palin has done exactly these things, and breathed life into this election, by showing her intelligence and by INSPIRING many of us... something Mr Obama has yet to do.

Reply

Sep 14, 2008

Hey Ryan, welcome to the fun.

Reply