socialmedian: Website Analyzer-Free SEO Analysis

User-submitted headlines for this story

Clips

Website Analyzer-Free SEO Analysis

Submitted by Heartsmart

Mar 10, 2009

Summary

This tool gives you a free SEO analysis of your website in 20 areas of popularity, relevancy and site structure. It takes about 20 seconds for the application to determine your score, from 0 to 100. The full analysis is a non-technical explanation of how to improve your score. Read the full article

Comments (31)

Solarcat,

Mar 10, 2009

This tool worked pretty well as soon as I realized that it didn't want me to input the full URL. I had to eliminate the 'http://' part before it would run. It would be nice to put a little example text on the page or, even better, reprogram it so it doesn't care whether or not the 'http://' is included. The current situation where you get an error message with no explanation is disconcerting.

In any case, providing this seems like an effective marketing tactic. I may just have to copy it!

Keithparis,

Mar 11, 2009

I must admit that this is a pretty useful tool. Quite the eye opener

Money24seven,

Mar 11, 2009

Yes I agree with Solarcat ... I came here to let you know the exact same thing pointed out above ... do it now! or you will be experiencing click aways ... and nobody online wants that now do WE! lol

Ferny Ceballos,

Mar 11, 2009

very cool. just tried it on my website. Opted in to see more. Let's see...

Roxanne,

Mar 11, 2009

I tried it before I read the reviews. I was wondering why my google page rank is 2 and this tool couldn't find my site. I almost clicked away then read the comments here about leaving out the http://. Once I got it to work, it is a great useful tool.

Eimgsocial,

Mar 11, 2009

Pretty cool tool, but some of the stats are not as accurate as they could be. If you get that spot on then your onto the winner, really fast though.. I've bookmarked it so it's still very addictive!

Mentor Rhonda,

Mar 11, 2009

This is a great tool! I too didn't realize for a min. that you don't enter the http:// But works great after knowing that!

Jhljhklhy,

Mar 12, 2009

http://www.spike.com/profile/vesthemer
http://origin.www.spike.com/blog/ezert/74789

Realmlmlife,

Mar 12, 2009

I like this tool a lot. It's perfect for my analytical personality. Between this and the headline tester tool, you can get a real good ranking for your website!

We Traveler,

Mar 12, 2009

Very cool tool. I am somewhat of a seo junky, so plan to add this to my war chest.

Jonclayton,

Mar 16, 2009

This is one mighty, powerful, and useful tool to add to my toolbox. Thank you!

Judith May,

Mar 17, 2009

awesome tool. thanks for the info

Hardhatmack88,

Mar 18, 2009

Thanks for the tool. This looks like it will come in handy for analytical feedback.

Maylehmann,

Mar 22, 2009

Thank you for sharing the toll with all of us. Good stuff. As most of my sites are blogs, I can't wait for their Blog Analyzer, which will be coming out very soon. But I guess using the Website Analyzer will do for now for me. Thanks again.

Mrkimb,

Mar 23, 2009

Wow! This is a great tool. What is the ETA of the Blog Analyzer? You'll have to put on extra help when word of that gets out. :-)

Elizabeth Nichols,

Mar 25, 2009

Good idea, but I couldn't get it to work even after I removed http://. Looking forward to trying it on my blogs.

Rickdavis,

Mar 26, 2009

I guess its a good idea, but how valid is it when some sites are even found

Leaderwith Dreams,

Mar 27, 2009

Great tool, thanks for sharing.

Pearanalytics,

Mar 29, 2009

@money24seven @solarcat thank you for the feedback. I made it so would not have to put "http://" since even browsers have been getting away from that over the past couple of years. Also, depending on how you set up your DNS, a "www.domain.com" vs "domain.com" can have different results. However, I will add something to be more descriptive on the error screen, or add "no http://" under the field.

Pearanalytics,

Mar 29, 2009

@eimgsocial thanks for the feedback! we have had some issues with site age, if that was one of your examples. Pls DM me any other inaccuracies!

Pearanalytics,

Mar 29, 2009

@mrkimb hi, and thanks for the feedback! Hopefully blog analyzer will come out in the next couple of months. Struggling with how I should get some of the data I really need to evaluate properly!

Pearanalytics,

Mar 29, 2009

@Elizabeth_Nichols Hi Elizabeth! What browser are you using? We are still having problems with IE7, so if you let it run, it should come up with a score.

Baldwin6,

Mar 31, 2009

Thanks for the analysis, it say's my site is average. I guess that means I'm half way there. Thanks for the insight it gives me somethings to work on.

Gary McElwain

Williamalston,

Mar 31, 2009

Seems simple enough therefore useful

Sheridd,

Apr 08, 2009

Thank you so much for sharing. I just analyzied my site and it stated that it was average. But ranked #2 with Google??

Dunc Mac,

Apr 09, 2009

Neat tool, for a quick overview of your site's performance and what to concentrate on. My site got a "Very Good" rating which is pleasing.

Asearvern,

Apr 09, 2009

Very interesting. I came out with a score of 66 and a 93 percentile. I'd like to check it out over time to see how it changes. Also I'd like to check other sites in comparison. Overall I think they're on to something. Thank you!

Pearanalytics,

Apr 11, 2009

@sheridd hi there! your Google PR (page rank) is from 0 to 10, where the higher the better. Most sites will be between 0 and 5 - even I have only a 3 right now :)

Pearanalytics,

Apr 11, 2009

@williamalston, @dunc_mac, @asearvern thanks for the comments! Updates coming soon! Fixes for IE7 and more.

Pearanalytics,

Apr 11, 2009

@rickdavis I guess it depends on what you were found for :) Many companies I work with can't even come up in the search results with their own names, but some do. You can try to change the content on your page, along with your meta data and see if that helps you over time. It works for me: do a search for "better marketing performance" :)

Searchbrat,

Apr 25, 2009

that is a really nice tool, think it highlighted a few problems with my site that i am aware of, in particular the structure would benefit with a more silod approach ...