MW: What [MySpace] understand[s] is their $25 billion to $30 billion valuation.-
JF: But that's [expletive]. We both know that's [expletive].
MW: It doesn't make any difference. That's gonna go down. What they are looking at is the distinct possibility that it can go down to nothing.
JF: How do you find that plausible? It's not even a utility like--the anti-Google argument is this: If someone builds a better search engine tomorrow, I have zero switching costs. If I am on MySpace, I have 500 friends. I use it to communicate with people. You can't just move. It's a pain in the ass. All your stuff is there.
MW: But that's exactly what they said about AOL.
JF: You did not develop that relationship with AOL.
MW: You did. You exactly did.
JF: How?
MW: Your email was there, because your friends were there. I mean, AOL operated actually as the community of its
He's also an (expletive deleted) cretin. MySpace users are poor and poorly educated? Does he have any demographics to back this up? I can't put any credence into anything the guy says after such a statement.
What a loser of a comment from Wolff: "if you’re on MySpace now, you’re a [expletive] cretin. And you’re not only a [expletive] cretin, but you’re poor. Nobody who has beyond an 8th grade level of education is on MySpace. It is for backwards people."