Submitted by Deannaizme
from blog:
Proposition 8 looks to have passed in California, writing discrimination into the state’s constitution. Needless to say, that is incredibly disappointing to many people (of which I am one). Gays and lesbians were told that, once again, they are second class citizens. It’s fine for gays and lesbians to pay the (Read More)
Belongs to the News Networks :
none (yet) -- click "share" to share with a network.
: And the nation takes one step forward, two back. As a gay man I just don't understand why the government (Supreme Court) is unable to take a stand on blatent discrimination. I do not believe in forcing a church/religious organisation to 'accept' or perform marriages. I DO believe EVERY marriage/state approved union should be overseen by a state official. If you want to have a religious ceremony, fine. But we should not allow ordained persons to act in lieu of state officials. We, too, will overcome someday.
: I was overwhelmed when I heard of the new on Prop 8. I agree, one step forward, two steps back. It makes no sense to me why this should even be an issue. What does it matter to anyone else? Really? Why should I be affected by the marriage of two individuals who are in love? Andrew Sullivan had a great point, and if you're not aware of him please, please go to his blog - one of the largest on the web, an originator of the medium. He said that it's quite interesting how conservatives are so against the issue of same-sex marriage (he himself is a conservative, and a homosexual), because taking the leap forward to marriage, and making a commitment to another person, man or woman, same sex or not, is very conservative. You would think that the party would be in favor of such a act. But we find that it's quite the opposite. Again, the dark maniacal shadows of religion lure over us as a nation, and will constantly divide the reasonable minds of humility, with the fearful minds of the faithful.